EDU221CMtextbookFeedbackOLD

Congratulations! You have finished the penultimate draft (next-to-the-last draft) of your Classroom Management Textbook Chapter! That was a lot of work, hopefully, done well.

Now it's time to give feedback to your peers and be ready to accept feedback from your peers. If you used wikispaces.com for your textbook chapter, be sure to set your site to allow discussion posts and comments from non-members.


 * 1) You have been assigned a textbook chapter to review and pass along your feedback. If the chapter you are reviewing is built on wikispaces.com, use the discussion area to post your feedback (click on the icon next to EDIT). If the chapter you are reviewing was built on a different site, use an email addressed to all team members who built the site you are reviewing AND cc: dr. theresa on the email.
 * 2) In the discussion post or email, copy and paste the questions from below into the body of the email/post and then answer the questions and post/send it to the owners/authors. Some may find it easier to copy and paste the questions into a text document first, answer the questions as they are reviewing the chapter, then copy and paste all the questions and answers at one time into the email or discussion post. It's your choice.
 * 3) As suggested in the //Bedford Handbook//: think of yourself as a coach and not a judge as you give feedback.

Questions to guide feedback:
What was one new thing you learned from this textbook chapter?

Do you feel that all the items in the "Table of Contents (list of topics in your chapter)" were addressed fully? Were the topics easy to find? Was the chapter easy to navigate?

Did you notice any duplication between this chapter and your chapter? Are there any areas where your chapter and this chapter could reference each other?

Was reactive management (what do you do when it doesn't work) addressed where applicable?

Were "dominoes" addressed (if this happens, what's the impact in other places?) where applicable?

Did you notice any typos/mechanics of writing issues? (If so, what were they?)

What question(s) on the topic do you still have that you wish was answered in the context of this chapter?

Looking at the theme or themes that your class identified (see the artifacts page), were the themes addressed or mentioned where applicable?

Looking at the rubric for this project, what suggestions do you have to offer to these authors that will make their site more successful?