EDU101UseOfHeaders

The rubrics for both the wiki and the philosophy paper talk about using headers to organize but not using obvious headers. There's a difference between "obvious use of headers" and "use of obvious headers".

Obvious use of headers would be headers that stuck out somehow--either the wording or choice of words is "obvious" or the font size or color is glaring.

Use of obvious headers is the use of the words that are exactly the questions you're answering. If you just use headers to make the transition from one topic to the next and your writing looks more like the answers to a short essay test, then you're using obvious headers. What you want is one paper or wiki that flows smoothly from beginning to end and just uses headers to help guide the reader by breaking up the text into understandable pieces. Good use of headings will improve clarity.

So you should get rid of the guiding questions as headers but replace them with headings appropriate to your topic. And you might find that you end up combining some sections (maybe your "after" and your "still if" headings will fit into one section with only 1 heading) or you end up adding additional headers.

There's more information in The Bedford Handbook: pg. 27 "Planning with headings" pgs. 108-111 (Section 5b) "Consider using headings"